Baanboard.com

Go Back   Baanboard.com > Forum > Baan Quick Support: Functional & Technical > Tools Administration & Installation

User login

Frontpage Sponsor

Main

Poll
How big is your Baan-DB (just Data AND Indexes)
0 - 200 GB
18%
200 - 500 GB
29%
500 - 800 GB
3%
800 - 1200 GB
8%
1200 - 1500 GB
8%
1500 - 2000 GB
13%
> 2000 GB
24%
Total votes: 80

Baanboard at LinkedIn


Reference Content

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25th September 2006, 23:30
chadwickh's Avatar
chadwickh chadwickh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 39
chadwickh is on a distinguished road
Baan: IVc4 - DB: Oracle 10.2.0.3 - OS: HP-UX 11.11
Porting set/ BW.exe upgrade ?/issue
Baan: Baan IVc4
DB: Oracle 8.1.7.x
OS: HP-UX 11.11
C/S: Both

We need to upgrade our porting set to support Oracle 10g. While we're at it I thought it would be good to upgrade our BW clients. Since we don't upgrade porint sets nor Baan clients very often I thought we'd get to the latest version of both, porting set 6.1c.07.11 and B40c.82 on the client. My question is:

Can I use an older client to access a newer porting set?
I'm having an issue with the 82 client - it seems when a user types in their name, it is capitalizing their letters in the user id. The user puts in us10556 and the error says:

2006-09-22[15:17:52]:E:US10556: ******* S T A R T of Error message *******
2006-09-22[15:17:52]:E:US10556: Log message called from /view/port.6.1c.06.07/vobs/tt/lib/ds_1/ds_bcnct.c: #181 keyword: DsSendNAck
2006-09-22[15:17:52]:E:US10556: Pid 21371 Uid 10556 Euid 10556 Gid 125 Egid 125
2006-09-22[15:17:52]:E:US10556: user_type S language 2 user_name US10556 tty ote locale ISO88591/NULL
2006-09-22[15:17:52]:E:US10556: Errno 0 bdb_errno 0
2006-09-22[15:17:52]:E:US10556: Log_mesg: Not authorized to run as user 'US10556'
2006-09-22[15:17:52]:E:US10556: ******* E N D of Error message *******

Baan says in their solution 13743 for the porting set that the porting set and BW are tied together:

"We advice to have always the latest BW version installed. But you can use a newer BW version against an older porting set version.
So it is not mandatory to update the portingset on the Baan server also, when installing the newest BW version on the client computers.
Although we advice to have also the latest version of the portingset installed on the Baan server.

The portingset and BW (bw.exe, bwprint.exe, etc) are always created as one build, and secondly the portingset components and BW components are separated from each other. So we end up with a "BW install" and a "portingset install".
This means that a certain combination of a BW version and a portingset version do have the same source code base.
Refer to the tables (PORTING SET VERSION VS. BW VERSION NUMBER) for these combinations.

PORTING SET VERSION VS. BW VERSION NUMBER:
porting set version: bw version number:
6.1c.07.11 82
6.1c.07.10 81
6.1c.07.09 80
6.1c.07.08 79
6.1c.07.07 78
6.1c.07.06 77
6.1c.07.05 76
6.1c.07.04 75
6.1c.07.03 74
6.1c.07.02 73
6.1c.07.01 72 "

Any ideas would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26th September 2006, 17:41
mark_h's Avatar
mark_h mark_h is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 7,386
mark_h will become famous soon enough
Baan: Baan 4C4 A&D1 - DB: Oracle - OS: Sun Solaris
Well I have never heard that the bw client is tied to the porting set. Baan has told us on a couple of occasions that we need to upgrade the client with the porting set. At the point we are running B40c.80 and connecting to our service pack test company, which has portingset 6.1c.07.11. At this point I do not know of any issues caused by this combination.
__________________
Mark

GO Cards!
My latest mantra - make sure you have latest stpapi patches and the latest session object. If on LN then please explore the option of using DAL2 functionality.

Shared Solutions for Baan systems provided free by Baan Board.
Play the Google game and help Baanboard get better rankings. Do your part. Click here to find how.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26th September 2006, 21:01
rpoenaru rpoenaru is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 20
rpoenaru is on a distinguished road
Baan: ERP LN 10.2.1 - DB: MS SQL Server 2012 - OS: MS Windows Server 2008 R2
Response

It is a known issue with BW 81 and 82. We logged an issue with SSA Global\Infor and suppose to be fixed in Porting Set 6.1c.07.12/BW 83. You have to use BW 80 or 79.

If you want to keep the BW 82, you have to put -- set USER=xxxxxx in the command line of the BW
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29th September 2006, 21:05
chadwickh's Avatar
chadwickh chadwickh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 39
chadwickh is on a distinguished road
Baan: IVc4 - DB: Oracle 10.2.0.3 - OS: HP-UX 11.11
Thanks

Thanks for the information . You're right, putting on the 80 client works now. Any idea who at Baan knows this. I'm working with support and it doesn't sound like this is a known issue.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd October 2006, 17:37
rpoenaru rpoenaru is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 20
rpoenaru is on a distinguished road
Baan: ERP LN 10.2.1 - DB: MS SQL Server 2012 - OS: MS Windows Server 2008 R2
More Info

Hi,

Please tell Support to search for Inquiry ID 320326 for MDA Space Missions and the resolution of the case is that will be fixed as part of Porting Set 6.1c.07.12. The SSA Global/Infor person was Chris Snyder.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Programming Question mr_suleyman Tools Development 37 11th November 2016 09:14
BW client parameters lsatenstein Tools Administration & Installation 2 31st January 2012 22:29
Cannot upgrade porting set because wrong MAS name chavez Tools Administration & Installation 5 23rd December 2005 13:43
Detected database server termination (help! aide! ayuda! hilfe! ayuto! hellup! •‚¯!)! Francesco Operating Systems & Databases 15 20th July 2002 12:37


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:12.


©2001-2018 - Baanboard.com - Baanforums.com