Go Back > Forum > Baan SIGs > Performance & Tuning

User login

Frontpage Sponsor


How big is your Baan-DB (just Data AND Indexes)
0 - 200 GB
200 - 500 GB
500 - 800 GB
800 - 1200 GB
1200 - 1500 GB
1500 - 2000 GB
> 2000 GB
Total votes: 65

Baanboard at LinkedIn

Reference Content

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18th April 2007, 07:40
anubhav.bansal anubhav.bansal is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 23
anubhav.bansal is on a distinguished road
Baan: Baan IV - DB: Oracle - OS: Unix
Session tfgld5400m000 performance
Baan: Baan IVc4
DB: Oracle 8.0.3.x
OS: Solaris 8 (SunOS 5.8)
C/S: None/Unknown

Hi All,
This session performance is very slow,I have analyzed a bit on it's query and found out the following points:
1.If we remove { tfgld410.fyer, tfgld410.fprd } between
{ :fyer.f , :fprd.f } and {:fyer.t, :fprd.t} and selection on table tisfc001 then it makes the query very fast.
But we can not remove this otherwise query will be wrong from the functional point of view so can any one please suggest something on it.

Whole query which we are using is :

select tfgld410.ocom, tfgld410.tror, tfgld410.fitr, tfgld410.trdt,
tfgld410.trtm, tfgld410.sern, tfgld410.leac, tfgld410.orno,
tfgld410.dbcr, tfgld410.cprj, tfgld410.amth, tfgld410.pono,
from tfgld410, tfgld418, tisfc001
where tfgld410._index2 inrange {:tfgld000.loco, "", tctror.prd, rno.f}
and {:tfgld000.loco, "", tctror.prd,rno.t}
and tfgld410.fcom =
and { tfgld410.fyer, tfgld410.fprd } between
{ :fyer.f , :fprd.f } and {:fyer.t, :fprd.t}
| and tfgld410._index1 refers to tfgld418
and tfgld418._index1 = tfgld410.c001
and tfgld418.sint = tfgld.sint.posted
| and tfgld410.orno refers to tisfc001.pdno
and tisfc001._index1 = {tfgld410.orno}
and tisfc001.osta inrange sts.f and sts.t
order by tfgld410._index2
| as prepared set
Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2007, 14:59
Juergen's Avatar
Juergen Juergen is offline
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 586
Juergen is on a distinguished road
Baan: IVc4, ERPLN - DB: Oracle - OS: Linux, Windows

is solution 162940 "The performance of the WIP reconciliation report is poor" installed on your system?

Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 12:37
sushshah sushshah is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4
sushshah is on a distinguished road
Baan: IV, ERP - DB: Oracle, Informix - OS: HP, Sun
Please try removing "as prepared set" statement.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
synchronizing different occurrences on parent session from child Ruskin Tools Development 8 18th March 2008 17:56
Editable synchronized dialogue not started srinivas AFS/DDC/OLE: Function servers 10 21st July 2005 07:25
Performance problems in session "Update Purchase Statistics" Erik Konrath Performance & Tuning 2 12th February 2003 11:14
Performance problem in session tisfc0102m000 christophe Manufacturing & Supply Chain 5 29th January 2003 16:59

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:42.

©2001-2018 - -